Mojtaba Norouzi; Marziyeh Bakhshiniya
Abstract
The expression "negation of motivation” in "Qol-e be Sarfeh" is an extra-linguistic concept. God deprives his audience of motivation. Thus the challenge remains unanswered. Historical evidence is the evidence of the rejection of doubt. But from an in-text perspective, are there actions needed to ...
Read More
The expression "negation of motivation” in "Qol-e be Sarfeh" is an extra-linguistic concept. God deprives his audience of motivation. Thus the challenge remains unanswered. Historical evidence is the evidence of the rejection of doubt. But from an in-text perspective, are there actions needed to motivate the context and meaning of the verse? If the concept of in-text and out-of-text is aligned, it is a good answer to reject the notion of "utterance" based on linguistic methods. The use of rhetorical strategies in the language of the Qur'an, such as awareness tools, exit from a clear requirement for words, and functions such as adjective and apposition, the use of the Mosul "àlÌazi" and ... in the context of the verse show that the verse of challenge is located in a motivational context. With all these incentives, if no challenge has been made, it is not due to its lack of motivation. It is the art of the text that works miracles.
